Neural network for solving differential equations

Authors

  • Khalil M

    Faculty of Engineering, October University for Modern Sciences and Arts (MSA), Egypt
  • Said M

    Faculty of Engineering, October University for Modern Sciences and Arts (MSA), Egypt
  • Ibrahim A

    Faculty of Engineering, October University for Modern Sciences and Arts (MSA), Egypt
  • Elserwi H

    Faculty of Engineering, October University for Modern Sciences and Arts (MSA), Egypt
  • Mostafa B

    Faculty of Engineering, October University for Modern Sciences and Arts (MSA), Egypt

How to Cite

M, K. ., M, S. ., A, I. ., H, E. ., & B, M. . (2025). Neural network for solving differential equations. International Journal of Scientific World, 11(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.14419/j7yksy12

Received date: April 24, 2025

Accepted date: June 2, 2025

Published date: June 7, 2025

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14419/j7yksy12

Keywords:

ANN; CNN; DNN; ODE; PDE

Abstract

Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs) and Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) are fundamental to modelling a wide range of scientific ‎and engineering phenomena, including fluid dynamics, heat conduction, and biological systems. Classical numerical methods, such as the ‎finite difference method (FDM) and finite element method (FEM), often suffer from high computational costs, difficulty in handling com-‎plex boundary conditions, and limited scalability. With the advancement of artificial intelligence, artificial neural networks (ANNs) and con-‎convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have emerged as powerful tools for solving differential equations. This paper explores the application of ‎neural networks for solving ODEs and PDEs, analyzing their effectiveness, advantages, and limitations as neural networks are predicted to ‎transform computational mathematics, offering more accurate results‎.

References

  1. Yadav, N., Yadav, A., & Kumar, M. (2015). An introduction to neural network methods for differential equations (Vol. 1, p. 7). Berlin: Springer. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-94-017-9816-7.pdf. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9816-7_4.
  2. Pires, P. B., Santos, J. D., & Pereira, I. V. (2025). Artificial neural networks: history and state of the art. Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Sixth Edition, 1-25. https://www.igi-global.com/pdf.aspx?tid=320788&ptid=307143&ctid=4&oa=true&isxn=9781668473665. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-7366-5.ch037.
  3. Hafiz, A.M., Faiq, I. & Hassaballah, M. Solving partial differential equations using large-data models: a literature review. Artif Intell Rev 57, 152 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10784-5.
  4. Dubey, S. K., Islahi, H., & Singh, R. (2024). Deep Neural Networks for Solving Ordinary Differential Equations: A Comprehensive Review. Inter-national Journal of Intelligent Communication and Computer Science, 1(2), 54-68. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378715647.
  5. Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P. and Karniadakis, G.E., 2019. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and in-verse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational physics, 378, pp.686-707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045.
  6. Baty, H., 2023. Solving stiff ordinary differential equations using physics informed neural networks (PINNs): simple recipes to improve training of vanilla-PINNs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08289.
  7. Hu, Z., Shukla, K., Karniadakis, G.E. and Kawaguchi, K., 2024. Tackling the curse of dimensionality with physics-informed neural net-works. Neural Networks, 176, p.106369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106369.
  8. Lagaris, I. E., Likas, A., & Fotiadis, D. I. (1998). Artificial neural networks for solving ordinary and partial differential equations. IEEE Transac-tions on Neural Networks, 9(5), 987–1000.https://www.cs.uoi.gr/~lagaris/papers/TNN-LLF.pdf. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.712178.
  9. Crews, D. W. (2022). Arbitrarily high order implicit ODE integration by correcting a neural network approximation with Newton’s method. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.00147.
  10. Gao, H., Sun, L., & Wang, J.-X. (2020). PhyGeoNet: Physics-Informed Geometry-Adaptive Convolutional Neural Networks for Solving Parameter-ized Steady-State PDEs on Irregular Domain. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.13145. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.13145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.110079.
  11. Tondak, A. (2024, December 6). Recurrent neural networks: An introduction. K21 Academy. https://k21academy.com/datascience-blog/machine-learning/recurrent-neural-networks/.
  12. Livieris, I. E., Pintelas, E., & Pintelas, P. (2020). A CNN–LSTM model for gold price time-series forecasting. Neural Computing and Applications, 32(23), 17351-17360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04867-x.
  13. Mienye, I. D., Swart, T. G., & Obaido, G. (2024). Recurrent Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Review of Architectures, Variants, and Applica-tions. Information, 15(9), 517. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15090517.
  14. Quradaa, M., Hamouda, A., & Hamouda, S. (2023). "A Systematic Literature Review on the Applications of Recurrent Neural Networks in Code Clone Detection." Neural Computing and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296858.
  15. Ren, Z. (2024). Advancements of Exploiting Convolutional Neural Networks for Solving Differential Equations. Proceedings of CONF-MLA 2024 Workshop, 190-195. https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/94/2024MELB0070.
  16. Zhang, R., Liu, Y., & Sun, H. (2020). Physics-guided Convolutional Neural Network (PhyCNN) for Data-driven Seismic Response Modeling. Engi-neering Structures, 215, 110704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110704.
  17. Hornik, K. (1991). Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks. Neural Networks, 4(2), 251–257.https://web.njit.edu/~usman/courses/cs677/hornik-nn-1991.pdf. https://doi.org/10.1016/0893-6080(91)90009-T.
  18. Su, D., Jiang, Q., Liu, E., & Liu, M. (2024). Improving Optimizers by Runge-Kutta Method: A case study of SGD and Adam. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Intelligent Systems (ICICIP). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engi-neers (IEEE). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICIP60808.2024.10477795.
  19. Su, D., Jiang, Q., Zhu, E., & Liu, M. (2023). An enhanced Runge Kutta boosted machine learning framework for medical diagnosis. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 166, 106949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106949.
  20. Gusak, J., Katrutsa, A., Daulbaev, T., Cichocki, A., & Oseledets, I. (2021). Meta-solver for neural ordinary differential equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.08561.https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.08561.
  21. Yuan, L., Tian, X., Yuan, J., Zhang, J., Dai, X., Heidari, A. A., Chen, H., & Yu, S. (2024). Enhancing network security with information-guided-enhanced Runge Kutta feature selection for intrusion detection. Cluster Computing, 27(3), 2231–2245 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-024-04544-x.
  22. Error! Reference source not found.Error! Reference source not found.Error! Reference source not found.Zhu, M., Chang, B., & Fu, C. (2022). Convolutional Neural Networks combined with Runge-Kutta Methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.08831v7.https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.08831.
  23. Chiaramonte, M. M., & Kiener, M. (2013). Solving differential equations using neural networks. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.0451.
  24. Tveito, A., & Winther, R. (2005). Introduction to partial differential equations. Springer. https://www.sgo.fi/~j/baylie/Introduction%20to%20Partial%20Differential%20Equations%20-%20A%20Computational%20Approach%20-%20A.%20Tveito,%20R.%20Winther.pdf.
  25. Wang, S., Teng, Y. and Perdikaris, P., 2021. Understanding and mitigating gradient flow pathologies in physics-informed neural networks. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 43(5), pp.A3055-A3081. https://doi.org/10.1137/20M1318043.
  26. Krishnapriyan, A., Gholami, A., Zhe, S., Kirby, R. and Mahoney, M.W., 2021. Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 34, pp.26548-26560.
  27. Farea, A., Khan, S. and Celebi, M.S., 2025. QCPINN: Quantum-Classical Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving PDEs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.16678.
  28. Xiao, Y., Yang, L.M., Shu, C., Chew, S.C., Khoo, B.C., Cui, Y.D. and Liu, Y.Y., 2024. Physics-informed quantum neural network for solving forward and inverse problems of partial differential equations. Physics of Fluids, 36(9). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0226232.

Downloads

How to Cite

M, K. ., M, S. ., A, I. ., H, E. ., & B, M. . (2025). Neural network for solving differential equations. International Journal of Scientific World, 11(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.14419/j7yksy12

Received date: April 24, 2025

Accepted date: June 2, 2025

Published date: June 7, 2025