Low-cost Smart Architecture for Classroom Response System Using Raspberry: RaspCRS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v8i1.11.28094Keywords:
Classroom Response System, Embedded System, Mobile Technology, E-learning, Technology-enhanced learningAbstract
The purpose of this paper is to present a low-cost architecture based on embedded systems for the operation of a Classroom Response System (CRS). In order to validate the proposed architecture, various tests were conducted with 30 students enrolled in a renewable energy master. As part of this study, a mobile-based CRS has been developed using web-based technologies that makes the system very easy to use in educational environments. It allows the teacher to interview students using multiple-choice questions, in order to test their understanding of a concept discussed in class, the results of a question are displayed in real time on the mobile of the teacher. This tool has a strategic character because it allows improving the image of our university, pursuing the paths of smart cities. The results of test show the advantages and limitations of this architecture.
Â
ÂReferences
[1] W. Dai and L. Fan, (2012). “Discussion about the Pros and Cons and Recommendations for Multimedia Teaching in Local Vocational Schools,†Phys. Procedia, vol. 33, pp. 1144–1148.
[2] T. M. Al-Hadithy, (2015). “The Traditional Vs. The Modern Translation Classroom: A Need for New Directions in the UAE Undergraduate Translation Programs,†Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 192, pp. 180–187.
[3] J. Macke, R. M. Casagrande, J. A. Sarate, and K. A. Silva, (2018) “Smart City and Quality of Life: citizens’ perception in a Brazilian case study,†J. Clean. Prod.
[4] H. M. S. Hossain, M. A. A. H. Khan, and N. Roy, (2017). “Active learning enabled activity recognition,†Pervasive Mob. Comput. vol. 38, pp. 312–330.
[5] E. Pacheco, M. Lips, and P. Yoong, (2018). “Transition 2.0: Digital technologies, higher education, and vision impairment,†Internet High. Educ., vol. 37, pp. 1–10A.
[6] Malaoui, (2016), “Low cost pedagogic device for practical works using embedded system†Proc. IEEE/ACS Int. Conf. Comput. Syst. Appl. AICCSA, vol. 2016–July,
[7] A. Malaoui, M. Kherallah, L. Ghomri, M. Raoufi, G. Andrieu, T. Fredon, and D. Barataud, (2017). “Implementation and validation of a new strategy of online practical works of power electronics for embedded systems,†Int. J. Online Eng., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 29–44.
[8] U. Kale,(2018). “Technology valued? Observation and review activities to enhance future teachers’ utility value toward technology integration,†Comput. Educ., vol. 117, pp. 160–174.
[9] V. W. Vongkulluksn, K. Xie, and M. A. Bowman, (2018). “The role of value on teachers’ internalization of external barriers and externalization of personal beliefs for classroom technology integration,†Comput. Educ., vol. 118, pp. 70–81.
[10] H. Heflin, J. Shewmaker, and J. Nguyen, (2017). “Impact of mobile technology on student attitudes, engagement, and learning,†Comput. Educ., vol. 107, pp. 91–99.
[11] Y. C. J. Wu, T. Wu, and Y. Li, (2017). “Impact of using classroom response systems on students’ entrepreneurship learning experience,†Comput. Human Behav, pp. 1–12.
[12] A. J. Guarascio, B. D. Nemecek, and D. E. Zimmerman, (2017). “Evaluation of students’ perceptions of the Socrative application versus a traditional student response system and its impact on classroom engagement,†Curr. Pharm. Teach. Learn. vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 808–812.
[13] R. J. Dufresne, W. J. Gerace, W. J. Leonard, J. P. Mestre, and L. Wenk, (1996).“Classtalk : A Classroom Communication System for Active Learning *.
[14] G. Fulantelli, D. Taibi, and M. Arrigo, (2015). “A framework to support educational decision making in mobile learning,†Comput. Human Behav. vol. 47, pp. 50–59.
[15] J. L. López-Quintero, M. Varo-MartÃnez, M. Ana, Laguna-Luna, and A. Pontes-Pedrajas, (2016). “Opinions on ‘Classroom Response System’ by First-year Engineering Students,†Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 228, no. June, pp. 183–189.
[16] R. H. Kay and A. LeSage, (2009). “A strategic assessment of audience response systems used in higher education,†Australas. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 235–249.
[17] J. T. Boyle and D. J. Nicol, (2003). “Using classroom communication systems to support interaction and discussion in large class settings,†Res. Learn. Technol., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 43–57.
[18] R. Christensen and G. Knezek, (2017). “Readiness for integrating mobile learning in the classroom: Challenges, preferences and possibilities,†Comput. Human Behav. vol. 76, pp. 112–121.
[19] S. A. Nikou and A. A. Economides, (2017). “Mobile-based assessment: Investigating the factors that influence behavioral intention to use,†Comput. Educ., vol. 109, pp. 56–73.
[20] “Deficall. 2004. Système de QCMs par SMS, online: http://demo.deficall.be/qcm.htm.â€.
[21] F. Mercier, B. David, R. Chalon, J. Berthet, F. Mercier, B. David, R. Chalon, J. B. Amphithéâtres, F. Mercier, B. David, R. Chalon, and J. Berthet, (2004). “Amphithéâtres interactifs dans l’ enseignement supérieur To cite this version : HAL Id : edutice-00000728 Amphithéâtres interactifs dans l’ enseignement supérieur.
[22] M. Ratto, R. B. Shapiro, T. a N. M. Truong, and W. G. Griswold, (2003). “The Activeclass Project : Experiments in,†Comput. Support Collab. Learn. Vol. Bergen, No, pp. 1–10.
[23] A. C. Dantas, H. Neri, E. Takahashi, and M. Fernandes, (2016). “XQUESTION: Um sistema pessoal de resposta para decisões estratégicas do professor durante uma aula,†no. Cbie, p. 367.
[24] A. Iles, D. Glaser, M. Kam, and J. Canny, (2002) “Learning via Distributed Dialogue: Livenotes and Handheld Wireless Technology,†in Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community, pp. 408–417.
Downloads
How to Cite
Received date: March 1, 2019
Accepted date: March 1, 2019
Published date: March 1, 2019