Analysis of Current Tools and Methods for Optimizing The Educational Process in The Context of Digital and Technological Development

Authors

  • Gulzat Kalmatova

    Department of Pedagogy and Methodology of Pre-School and Primary Education, Kyrgyz-Uzbek International University named after B. Sydykov, Osh, Kyrgyz Republic

  • Gulmira Tagaeva

    Department of Theory and Methodology of Teaching Russian Language and Literature, Faculty of Russian Philology, Kyrgyz State University named after I. Arabaev, Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic

  • Nazgul Segizbaeva

    Department of Theory and Methodology of Teaching Russian Language and Literature, Faculty of Russian Philology, Kyrgyz State University named after I. Arabaev, Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic

  • Navruz Khasanov

    Department of Theory and Methodology of Teaching Russian Language and Literature, Faculty of Russian Philology, Kyrgyz State University named after I. Arabaev, Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic

How to Cite

Kalmatova, G. ., Tagaeva, G. ., Segizbaeva, N. ., & Khasanov, N. (2025). Analysis of Current Tools and Methods for Optimizing The Educational Process in The Context of Digital and Technological Development. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 14(SI-3), 91-99. https://doi.org/10.14419/edm8px55

Received date: May 8, 2025

Accepted date: June 27, 2025

Published date: August 15, 2025

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14419/edm8px55

Keywords:

Electronic Educational Environment; Interactive Learning; Linguistic Analysis; Pedagogical Innovations; Philological Education; Virtual Communication.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the system of optimization of the educational process based on modern digital tools and methods in the context of philological education. The study combined qualitative and quantitative methods in a mixed-methods approach. Methodological recommendations for the introduction of digital technologies in the educational process of the Faculty of Russian Philology of the Kyrgyz State University named after I. Arabaev were developed. These recommendations include mechanisms for the development of digital infrastructure, professional development programs for teachers, methods of creating and adapting educational content for philological disciplines, and tools for monitoring the effectiveness of learning. The study revealed that the use of digital tools led to a significant increase in student engagement in academic discussions by 27%, timely submission of assignments by 17%, and overall satisfaction with the learning format by 23%. A theoretical model of gradual integration of digital tools, considering the specifics of philological education, is presented. The study demonstrates the need for an integrated approach to digital transformation, considering the unique characteristics of philological disciplines, particularly the challenges of working with linguistic and literary materials in digital environments. A system of recommendations for optimizing the learning process has been developed, covering technological, organizational, methodological, and pedagogical aspects of digital transformation, with a focus on creating interactive forms of working with textual materials and developing professional competencies in the digital environment.

References

  1. Alenezi M 2023. Digital learning and digital institutions in higher education. Education Sciences, 13(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010088
  2. Alenezi M, Wardat S & Akour M 2023. The need to integrate digital education in higher education: Challenges and opportunities. Sustainability, 15(6), 4782. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064782
  3. Aviv I, Svetinovic D & Lee S-W 2024. Requirements Engineering for Web3 Systems: Preface. In Proceedings - 32nd IEEE International Require-ments Engineering Conference Workshops, REW 2024 (pp. 326–327). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1109/REW61692.2024.00049
  4. Barotovich KN & Kochkorovna AT 2024. Working with scientific text in Russian lessons as a basis for forming communicative competence stu-dents. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 12(4), 514–525. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2024.124035
  5. Basar ZM, Mansor AN, Jamaludin KA & Alias BS 2021. The effectiveness and challenges of online learning for secondary school students – A case study. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(3), 119–129. http://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i3.14514
  6. Beardsley M, Albó L, Aragón P & Hernández‐Leo D 2021. Emergency education effects on teacher abilities and motivation to use digital technol-ogies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1455–1477. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13101
  7. Bezshyyko O, Dolinskii A, Bezshyyko K, Kadenko I, Yermolenko R & Ziemann V 2008. PETAG01: A program for the direct simulation of a pel-let target. Computer Physics Communications, 178(2), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2007.07.013
  8. Bizami NA, Tasir Z & Kew SN 2023. Innovative pedagogical principles and technological tools capabilities for immersive blended learning: A sys-tematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 1373–1425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11243-w
  9. Botín-Sanabria DM, Mihaita A-S, Peimbert-García RE, Ramírez-Moreno MA, Ramírez-Mendoza RA & Lozoya-Santos JDJ 2022. Digital twin technology challenges and applications: A comprehensive review. Remote Sensing, 14(6), 1335. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14061335
  10. Brovina F, Shkreli L & Bushati M 2024. Fostering excellence in sports, recreation, and rehabilitation: Leadership and management in Albanian higher education institutions. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(6), 3519–3523. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i6.2744
  11. Bygstad B, Øvrelid E, Ludvigsen S & Dæhlen M 2022. From dual digitalization to digital learning space: Exploring the digital transformation of higher education. Computers and Education, 182, 104463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104463
  12. Clark-Wilson A, Robutti O & Thomas M 2020. Teaching with digital technology. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 52(7), 1223–1242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01196-0
  13. de Oliveira LC, Guerino GC, de Oliveira LC & Pimentel AR 2023. Information and communication technologies in education 4.0 paradigm: A sys-tematic mapping study. Informatics in Education, 22(1), 71–98. http://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2023.03
  14. Decuypere M, Grimaldi E & Landri P 2021. Introduction: Critical studies of digital education platforms. Critical Studies in Education, 62(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1866050
  15. Derevianko D & Shovkaliuk M 2023. Formation of the soft skills for students of energy specialties through the implementation of active learning methods into the educational process. Technologies and Engineering, 24(6), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.30857/2786-5371.2023.6.1
  16. Diachuk O 2024. Adapting curricula to the requirements of the modern digital environment. Professional Education: Methodology, Theory and Technologies, 10(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.69587/pemtt/1.2024.10
  17. Dudko S 2024. Modeling of the educational environmentin the teacher’s professional and pedagogical activity. Ukrainian Professional Education, 8(1), 93-100.
  18. Griban GP, Yavorska TY, Tkachenko PP, Kuvaldina OV, Dikhtiarenko ZM, Yeromenko EA, Lytvynenko AM, Hresa NV, Okhrimenko IM, Ovcharuk IS & Prontenko KV 2020. Motor activity as the basis of a healthy lifestyle of student youth. Wiadomosci Lekarskie (Warsaw, Poland : 1960), 73(6), 1199–1206. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32723953/
  19. Haleem A, Javaid M, Qadri MA & Suman R 2022. Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3(4), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
  20. Iglesias-Pradas S, Hernández-García Á, Chaparro-Peláez J & Prieto JL 2021. Emergency remote teaching and students’ academic performance in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 119(3), 106713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106713
  21. Jobirovich YM 2022. Effectiveness of using digital technologies in educational system. European Journal of Modern Medicine and Practice, 2(4), 124–128.
  22. Kálmán BG & Poyda-Nosyk N 2023. The role of the teacher-student relationship in the innovation of education: Interdisciplinary review of the issue. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”, 9(3), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.52534/msu-pp3.2023.72
  23. Kapoor G, Chahal A, Sharma N, Kaur S & Hendrik H 2025. Electronic-learning: Friend or Foe. International Journal of Educational Reform, 34(2), 405–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879221140095
  24. Kerimkhulle S, Kerimkulov Z, Bakhtiyarov D, Turtayeva N & Kim J 2021. In-Field Crop-Weed Classification Using Remote Sensing and Neural Network. In SIST 2021 - 2021 IEEE International Conference on Smart Information Systems and Technologies (article number: 9465970). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIST50301.2021.9465970.
  25. Khasanov N & Nusupova K 2024. Using information technology as a means of speech development in junior schoolchildren. Bulletin of Science and Practice, 10(4), 583–587. https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/101/73
  26. Kholiavko N, Popelo O, Bazhenkov I, Shaposhnykova I & Sheremet O 2021. Information and communication technologies as a tool of strategy for ensuring the higher education adaptability to the digital economy challenges. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 21(8), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2021.21.8.25
  27. Law of the Kyrgyz Republic No. 1074-XII “On Education” 1992. Available at: https://cbd.minjust.gov.kg/112665/edition/1273902/ru
  28. Lucas M, Bem-Haja P, Siddiq F, Moreira A & Redecker C 2021. The relation between in-service teachers’ digital competence and personal and contextual factors: What matters most? Computers and Education, 160(3), 104052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104052
  29. Marion TJ & Fixson SK 2021. The transformation of the innovation process: How digital tools are changing work, collaboration, and organizations in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(1), 192–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12547
  30. Mariukhnich T & Mokliak V 2024. Effectiveness of using augmented reality technology in the educational process. Scientific Bulletin of Muka-chevo State University. Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”, 10(4), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.52534/msu-pp4.2024.09
  31. Mukhtarova N, Nurtazina R, Krawczyk D, Barvinok V, Vorontsova A, Vasić S & Vasylieva T 2024. Interconnections in the education-migration-labor market chain in Central and Eastern Europe. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(4), 470–486. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(4).2024.35
  32. Nikolopoulou K, Gialamas V & Lavidas K 2021. Habit, hedonic motivation, performance expectancy and technological pedagogical knowledge affect teachers’ intention to use mobile internet. Computers and Education Open, 2(4), 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100041
  33. Onipko, V., & Yaprynets, T. 2024. Formation of readiness for innovative educational activities as a key competence of future specialists. Ukrainian Professional Education, 8(2), 71–78. https://uaprofedu.com.ua/en/journals/tom-8-2-2024/formuvannya-gotovnosti-do-innovatsiynoyi-osvitnoyi-diyalnosti-yak-klyuchovoyi-kompetentnosti-maybutnikh-fakhivtsiv
  34. Onyshchenko N & Serdiuk N 2025. Peculiarities of training future specialists in higher education institutions using innovative teaching technologies. Scientia et Societus, 4(1), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.69587/ss/1.2025.86
  35. Pavliuchenko I 2023. Distance future of educational space in the context of blended learning. Pedagogical Sciences, 6(2), 137–140. https://doi.org/10.33989/2524-2474.2023.82.295121
  36. Petrova MM, Sushchenko O, Trunina I & Dekhtyar N 2018. Big data tools in processing information from open sources. In 2018 IEEE 1st Interna-tional Conference on System Analysis and Intelligent Computing, SAIC 2018 - Proceedings (article number: 8516800). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1109/SAIC.2018.8516800
  37. Prontenko K, Bloshchynskyi I, Griban G, Zhukovskyi Y, Yavorska T, Tkachenko P, Dzenzeliuk D, Dovgan N, Bezpaliy S & Andreychuk V 2019. Formation of readiness of future physical culture teachers for professional activity. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(9), 1860–1868. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070903
  38. Qureshi MI, Khan N, Raza H, Imran A & Ismail F 2021. Digital technologies in education 4.0. Does it enhance the effectiveness of learning? A systematic literature review. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(4), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i04.20291
  39. Rafiola RH, Setyosari P, Radjah CL & Ramli M 2020. The effect of learning motivation, self-efficacy, and blended learning on students’ achieve-ment in the industrial revolution 4.0. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(8), 71–82. http://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i08.12525
  40. Rakhimberdinova M, Nurekenova E, Suieubayeva S, Duarte Á & Ordabayeva M 2022. Predictors Influencing the Choice of Master’s Programs in the Tourism Industry. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 13(4), 1161–1177. https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v13.4(60).22
  41. Riznyk V & Riznyk N 2024. Methodological aspects of using artificial intelligence in the preparation of future vocational education specialists. Pro-fessional Education: Methodology, Theory and Technologies, 10(2), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.69587/pemtt/2.2024.103
  42. Sabatayeva B, Saduov A, Madiyarova E, Jempeissova G, Selezneva I, Shtiller M & Fursova T 2018. International students' satisfaction with uni-versity services: The case of postgraduate students from central Asia. Espacios, 39(9), 04.
  43. Sailer M, Murböck J & Fischer F 2021a. Digital learning in schools: What does it take beyond digital technology? Teaching and Teacher Education, 103(1), 103346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103346
  44. Sailer M, Schultz-Pernice F & Fischer F 2021b. Contextual facilitators for learning activities involving technology in higher education: The C♭-model. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106794
  45. Selwyn N 2021. Education and technology: Key issues and debates. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  46. Semenovska L, Vazhenina I & Fazan V 2023. Individualization of learning as a development actuality information technological society. Pedagogi-cal Sciences, 6(2), 30–34. https://doi.org/10.33989/2524-2474.2023.82.295073
  47. Shcherban T & Khoma P 2024. Formation of digital competence of future primary school teachers by using artificial intelligence. Humanities Stu-dios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, 12(3), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog/3.2024.36
  48. Shevchuk L & Hunaza L 2025. Analysis of international experience in implementing Artificial Intelligence in the educational process. Scientia et Societus, 4(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.69587/ss/1.2025.76
  49. Sopivnyk R, Cherednyk L & Leshchenko R 2024. Content and structure of the concept “culture of modern cyberspace usage”. Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, 12(3), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog/3.2024.90
  50. Spiteri M & Chang Rundgren S-N 2020. Literature review on the factors affecting primary teachers’ use of digital technology. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9376-x
  51. Spytska L 2024. Symptoms and Main Differences between a Psychopath and a Sociopath. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 212(1), 52–56. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000001728
  52. State Educational Standard of Higher Professional Education: Philology 2021. Available at: https://muk.iuk.kg/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/531000-Filologiya-1.pdf
  53. Susanti LYD, Zulaeha I, Supriyanto T & Pristiwati R 2025. The Effectiveness of Interactive Digital Learning Media to Improve Writing Skills in Tembang and Geguritan. International Journal of Educational Reform. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879241302835
  54. Szymkowiak A, Melović B, Dabić M, Jeganathan K & Kundi GS 2021. Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people. Technology in Society, 65(6), 101565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101565
  55. Valverde-Berrocoso J, Fernández-Sánchez MR, Revuelta Dominguez FI & Sosa-Díaz MJ 2021. The educational integration of digital technologies pre-Covid-19: Lessons for teacher education. PloS ONE, 16(8), e0256283. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256283
  56. Warke V, Kumar S, Bongale A & Kotecha K 2021. Sustainable development of smart manufacturing driven by the digital twin framework: A sta-tistical analysis. Sustainability, 13(18), 10139. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810139
  57. Wekerle C, Daumiller M & Kollar I 2022. Using digital technology to promote higher education learning: The importance of different learning ac-tivities and their relations to learning outcomes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1799455
  58. Wilkens L, Haage A, Lüttmann F & Bühler CR 2021. Digital teaching, inclusion and students’ needs: Student perspectives on participation and access in higher education. Social Inclusion, 9(3), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v9i3.4125

Downloads

How to Cite

Kalmatova, G. ., Tagaeva, G. ., Segizbaeva, N. ., & Khasanov, N. (2025). Analysis of Current Tools and Methods for Optimizing The Educational Process in The Context of Digital and Technological Development. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 14(SI-3), 91-99. https://doi.org/10.14419/edm8px55

Received date: May 8, 2025

Accepted date: June 27, 2025

Published date: August 15, 2025