Optimization of The Educational Environment Using Digital Tools and Technologies

Authors

  • Cholpon Askarova

    Department of Physics, Mathematics, Informatics and Computer Technologies, I.K. Akhunbaev Kyrgyz State Medical Academy, Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic

  • Aigul Aitbai kyzy

    Institute of Mathematics, Physics, Engineering and Information Technologies, Osh State University, Osh, Kyrgyz Republic

  • Volodymyr Shevchenko

    Department of Engineering and Production Technologies, Dragomanov Ukrainian State University, Kyiv, Ukraine

  • Oleksandr Kuchmenko

    Department of Engineering and Production Technologies, Dragomanov Ukrainian State University, Kyiv, Ukraine

  • Lyudmyla Scherbak

    Department of Engineering and Production Technologies, Dragomanov Ukrainian State University, Kyiv, Ukraine

How to Cite

Askarova, C., Aitbai kyzy, A., Shevchenko, V. ., Kuchmenko, O. ., & Scherbak, L. . (2025). Optimization of The Educational Environment Using Digital Tools and Technologies. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 14(SI-3), 73-83. https://doi.org/10.14419/smpb4t93

Received date: April 28, 2025

Accepted date: July 21, 2025

Published date: August 15, 2025

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14419/smpb4t93

Keywords:

Adaptation of Educational Applicants; Assessment System; Educational Platforms; Learning Process; Motivation

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of using digital tools and technologies in the educational process to optimise learning. The methodology includes an experiment with 200 students who were divided into control and experimental groups. The experiment consists of three stages: collecting data from participants for the experiment, using digital technologies by the experimental group, and re-evaluating learning success by comparing the academic results of both groups. The technologies are adapted by integrating with curricula, personalising content, using analytics to monitor progress, providing flexible learning formats, and implementing student feedback. The control group used traditional teaching methods, while the experimental group used modern digital tools. The experimental study found that the use of digital technologies in the learning process contributes to improving academic performance and student engagement. After one semester of study, the average score of students in the experimental group increased from 75.3 to 89.7, while in the control group it increased only from 74.5 to 84.1. Attendance in the digital group increased from 88 to 92 academic hours, and the number of active responses increased from 17 to 25. Participation in group projects increased by 20%, and the frequency of participation in tests increased by 25% compared to the control group. The analysis of the obtained data confirms that the integration of modern digital tools into the educational process not only increases the efficiency of mastering the material but also reduces the time spent on learning compared to the old methods.

References

  1. Adler O, Prychepa I, Ruda L. Model of formation of economic competences of specialists in technical specialties in the conditions of European in-tegration. Innovation and Sustainability. 2023:(1):106–117. https://doi.org/10.31649/ins.2023.1.106.117
  2. Analytical note on trends in the organisation of distance learning in higher education institutions in the 2021/2022 academic year under martial law 2023. Available at: https://sqe.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/ANALITICHNA-DOVIDKA-ZVO_12.06.pdf
  3. Anamova R, Leonova S, Nartova L & Tereshchenko V 2020. Digital spatial models in technology as a development tool of the intellectual creative aspect within education. TEM Journal, 9(3):1186–1193. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM93-45
  4. Aryabkina I, Donina O, Ivanushkina N, Chernykh A, Gajburova N & Chernova J 2021. Modern trends and specifics of additional professional ed-ucation of university teachers. Wisdom, 19(3):55–67. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v19i3.499
  5. Azieva G, Kerimkhulle S, Turusbekova U, Alimagambetova A & Niyazbekova S 2021. Analysis of access to the electricity transmission network using information technologies in some countries. E3S Web of Conferences, 258:11003. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125811003
  6. Bezshyyko O, Dolinskii A, Bezshyyko K, Kadenko I, Yermolenko R & Ziemann V 2008. PETAG01: A program for the direct simulation of a pel-let target. Computer Physics Communications, 178(2):144–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2007.07.013
  7. Bilyk V, Shpileva V, Voynikova A. Theoretical aspects of the strategy for the positioning of agricultural enterprises as a tool for increasing their competitiveness. Innovation and Sustainability. 2024;(3):145–150. https://doi.org/10.31649/ins.2024.3.145.150
  8. Boltsi A, Kalovrektis K, Xenakis A, Chatzimisios P & Chaikalis C 2024. Digital tools, technologies, and learning methodologies for education 4.0 frameworks: A STEM oriented survey. IEEE Access, 12:12883–12901. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3355282
  9. Conlon M, Smart F & McIntosh G 2020. Does technology flatten authenticity? Exploring the use of digital storytelling as a learning tool in mental health nurse education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(3):269–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1760127
  10. Danylevskyi D 2024. The impact of distance learning on the development of information and communication skills of students of higher education institutions. Professional Education: Methodology, Theory and Technologies, 10(1):22-33. https://doi.org/10.69587/pemtt/1.2024.22
  11. Dashko Y 2023. Information technologies in the educational process: Features and advantages. Pedagogical Sciences, 6(2):46-51. https://doi.org/10.33989/2524-2474.2023.82.295094
  12. Diachuk O 2024. Adapting curricula to the requirements of the modern digital environment. Professional Education: Methodology, Theory and Technologies, 10(1):10-21. https://doi.org/10.69587/pemtt/1.2024.10
  13. Efremov A 2025a. The Fear Primacy Hypothesis in the Structure of Emotional States: A Systematic Literature Review. Psychological Reports. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941241313106
  14. Efremov A 2025b. The Psychology of Faith and Religious Identity: How Theology Shapes Worldview and Self-Perception. Pharos Journal of The-ology, 106(3):1-15. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.3020
  15. Himang CM, Cernias R, Corbes RU, Alicer MJ, Colobong B, Olarte JM, Ocampo L, Bongo MF & Ancheta Jr R 2023. Modelling the utilization of digital technology in education during the COVID-19 pandemic through an expert-based analytic tool. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 19(1):23. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.332863
  16. Hogan K, Fowler J, Barnes C, Ludwig A, Cristiano D, Morales D, Quiñones R, Twidwell D & Dauer J 2022. New multimedia resources for ecolog-ical resilience education in modern university classrooms. Ecosphere, 13(10):e4245. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4245
  17. Huang B 2024. Construction and application of a modern comprehensive education management system in universities aimed at fostering virtue through education. International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCINI.343630
  18. Kozhukhova N, Veselova J & Chekuldova S 2021. Application of IT technologies in personnel management in the era of digitalization. In: SI Ashmarina & VV Mantulenko (Eds), Digital Economy and the New Labor Market: Jobs, Competences and Innovative HR Technologies (pp.184–192). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60926-9_25
  19. Kulkarni R & Harne R 2024. Adoption and usage of augmented reality-based virtual laboratories tool for engineering studies. Journal of Infor-mation Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 23:10. https://doi.org/10.28945/5351
  20. Lazar I, Panisoara G & Panisoara I 2020. Adoption of digital storytelling tool in natural sciences and technology education by pre-service teachers using the Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(3):429–453. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.429
  21. Lin Y & Yu Z 2023. Extending technology acceptance model to higher-education students’ use of digital academic reading tools on computers. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00403-8
  22. Liu Q, Cao X & Wang C 2022. Graduate education of Christian universities in modern China: A case study of Nanking University. Religions, 12:1095. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12121095
  23. Malik U 2024. Developing Student Metacognition Through Collaborative Work on the Quip Platform. International Journal of Educational Reform. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879241247557
  24. Mariukhnich T & Mokliak V 2024. Effectiveness of using augmented reality technology in the educational process. Scientific Bulletin of Muka-chevo State University. Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”, 10(4):9-16. https://doi.org/10.52534/msu-pp4.2024.09
  25. Melnykov O. Decision-making support system for determining the fitness of scientific and educational activity objects to scientific and educational fields and specialties. Information Technology and Computer Engineering. 2023;57(2):109–116. https://doi.org/10.31649/1999-9941-2023-57-2-109-116
  26. Muthuraman B 2021. Education tools and technologies in the digital age for society 5.0. In: Digitalization of Higher Education using Cloud Com-puting (pp.3–9). London: Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003203070
  27. Onipko V & Yaprynets T 2024. Formation of readiness for innovative educational activities as a key competence of future specialists. Ukrainian Professional Education, 8(2):71-78.
  28. Onyshchenko N & Serdiuk N 2025. Peculiarities of training future specialists in higher education institutions using innovative teaching technologies. Scientia et Societus, 4(1):86-95. https://doi.org/10.69587/ss/1.2025.86
  29. Ou Z & Xie X 2024. Optimization of the quality management path of physical education teaching in colleges and universities integrating modern network technology. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1):347–364. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2023.1.00347
  30. Pavlenko V, Ponomarenko I, Morhulets O, Fedorchenko A & Pylypenko V 2023. Use of information technologies and marketing tools for the for-mation of an educational platform. In: Proceedings ITTAP’2023: 3rd International Workshop on Information Technologies: Theoretical and Ap-plied Problems.
  31. Pavliuchenko I 2023. Distance future of educational space in the context of blended learning. Pedagogical Sciences, 6(2):137-140. https://doi.org/10.33989/2524-2474.2023.82.295121
  32. Pavlova D, Dovramadjiev T, Daskalov D, Mirchev N, Peev I, Radeva J, Dimova R, Kavaldzhieva K, Mrugalska B, Szabo G, Kandioglou A 2024. 3D Design of a Dental Crown with Artificial Intelligence Based in Cloud Space. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 817:437–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7886-1_37
  33. Plakhotnyk O & Burian S 2024. The organisation of the educational process in the distance learning format in the frontline territories during the period of martial law in Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”, 10(3):9-16. https://doi.org/10.52534/msu-pp3.2024.09
  34. Porkodi S & Raman AM 2025. Success of cloud computing adoption over an era in human resource management systems: a comprehensive meta-analytic literature review. Management Review Quarterly, 75(2):1041–1075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00401-0
  35. Prochazka A, Vysata O & Marik V 2021. Integrating the role of computational intelligence and digital signal processing in education: Emerging technologies and mathematical tools. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 38(3):154–162. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2021.3058634
  36. Reva M 2022. Characteristics of emotional intelligence of students with different levels of development of communicative abilities. Psychology and Personality, 12(1):143-153. https://doi.org/10.33989/2226-4078.2022.1.252063
  37. Rexhepi BR, Kumar A, Gowtham MS, Rajalakshmi R, Paikaray MD & Adhikari PK 2023. An Secured Intrusion Detection System Integrated with the Conditional Random Field For the Manet Network. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 11(3s):14–21.
  38. Ronzhes O 2023. Digital applications as tools for psychological adaptation of citizens to changes. Scientific Studios on Social and Political Psy-chology, 29(2):14-25. https://doi.org/10.61727/sssppj/2.2023.14
  39. Salas Hernández JI, Murillo Rozo SA, Guarnizo Vargas CM & Rodríguez Araque E 2022. Digital collaboration platform applied to university man-agement. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 27(8):819–834. https://doi.org/10.52080/rvgluz.27.8.6
  40. Savytska L, Tarnovskyi M, Gerasyk O. Interactive knowledge testing software module. Information Technology and Computer Engineering. 2023;56(1):22–29. https://doi.org/10.31649/1999-9941-2023-56-1-22-29
  41. Shevchuk L & Hunaza L 2025. Analysis of international experience in implementing Artificial Intelligence in the educational process. Scientia et Societus, 4(1):76-85. https://doi.org/10.69587/ss/1.2025.76
  42. Shults R & Annenkov A 2023. BIM and UAV photogrammetry for spatial structures sustainability inventory. International Archives of the Photo-grammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives, 48(5/W2-2023):99–104. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-5-W2-2023-99-2023
  43. Slavko G, Serhiienko S, Shmelova A & Kovalenko K 2022. Problems and organizational measures of implementing and providing the distance elec-trical engineering education at the university using LMS moodle in the conditions of modern challenges in Ukraine. In: Proceedings of the 4th In-ternational Conference on Modern Electrical and Energy System (pp.1–5). Kremenchuk: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/MEES58014.2022.10005746
  44. Sokol IP & Koc H 2024. Exploring the digital landscape in higher education: Investigating the role of technology, techno-invasion, techno-overload, and tools in student well-being. In: Proceedings of the 2024 9th International Conference on Information and Education Innovations (pp.70–77). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3664934.3664936
  45. Sorokolit N, Rymar O, Bodnar I, Khanikiants O & Solovey A 2024. Multimedia technologies as tools for fostering digital literacy in education. Environment. Technologies. Resources. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, 2:493–498. https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2024vol2.8077
  46. Spytska L 2023. Psychological profile and prerequisites for the formation of the killer’s personality. Social and Legal Studios, 6(1):41–48.
  47. Spytska L 2024. Practice-based methods of bringing to legal liability for anonymous defamation on the Internet and in the media. Social and Legal Studios, 7(1):202–209. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals1.2024.202
  48. Suhaimi MS, Mahamarowi NH, Azli AF & Narizal MN 2024. The intersection of technology and education: An immersive interior design digital application as an innovative teaching tool. In: Proceedings of the 20th IEEE International Colloquium on Signal Processing & Its Applications (pp.242–247). Langkawi: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSPA60979.2024.10525462
  49. Susanti LYD, Zulaeha I, Supriyanto T & Pristiwati R 2025. The Effectiveness of Interactive Digital Learning Media to Improve Writing Skills in Tembang and Geguritan. International Journal of Educational Reform. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879241302835
  50. Tekesbaeva N, Kultan Y, Ongarbayeva A, Ibraev A & Yerimbetova Z 2023. Digital technologies as an adaptive learning tool in higher education. E3S Web of Conferences, 403:08023. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340308023
  51. Thongkoo K, Daungcharone K & Thanyaphongphat J 2020. Students’ acceptance of digital learning tools in programming education course using Technology Acceptance Model. In: Joint International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology with ECTI Northern Section Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Computer and Telecommunications Engineering (pp.377–380). Pattaya: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTIDAMTNCON48261.2020.9090771
  52. Uludag K 2023. Exploring the hidden aspects of ChatGPT: A study on concerns regarding plagiarism levels. Scientific Studios on Social and Polit-ical Psychology, 29(1):43-48. https://doi.org/10.61727/sssppj/1.2023.43
  53. UNESCO 2021. Promoting the use of information technologies in education and skills development in rural and remote areas of Central Asia. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379222_rus
  54. Vieilandie L, Soloveichuk O, Petryk L, Kosharna N & Dzhurylo A 2024. Strategies for developing hard skills in higher education students through innovative pedagogical technologies in realistic professional environments. Salud, Ciencia Y Tecnología – Serie De Conferencias, 3:1147. https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf20241147
  55. Vishnikina L, Samoilenko V & Davydenko O 2024. Technological support for online learning of future geography teachers. Ukrainian Professional Education, 8(1):30-41.
  56. Wang C & Li S 2023. The construction of modern aesthetic education innovative talent cultivation mode in universities based on big data technol-ogy. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2023.1.00231
  57. Wang G & Sheng C 2023. Classroom teaching management and resource optimization in colleges and universities based on big data technology. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Social Sciences and Intelligence Management (pp.69–73). Taichung: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSIM59263.2023.10469058
  58. Wang W 2022. College English teaching platform optimization under cross-media and mobile internet environment. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 1:9672463. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9672463
  59. Wezom 2024. The role and influence of cloud technologies in education. Available at: https://wezom.com.ua/ua/blog/rol-ta-vpliv-hmarnih-tehnologiy-v-osviti
  60. Xavier A, Fiuza Fialho L & Lima V 2019. Digital technologies and the teaching of Chemistry: The use of open-source software as methodological tools. Foro de Educacion, 17(27):289–308. https://doi.org/10.14516/fde.617
  61. Yanovska T 2022. Social intelligence in the structure of professionally important qualities of a psychologist. Psychology and Personality, 12(2):153-168. https://doi.org/10.33989/2226-4078.2022.2.265494
  62. Zhang J & Chen Z 2024. Exploring human resource management digital transformation in the digital age. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15:1482–1498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01214-y
  63. Zhou Q, Chen Y & Luo W 2023. Evaluation of the role of information technology in the reform of teaching methods in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 16(2):112–130. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.337604

Downloads

How to Cite

Askarova, C., Aitbai kyzy, A., Shevchenko, V. ., Kuchmenko, O. ., & Scherbak, L. . (2025). Optimization of The Educational Environment Using Digital Tools and Technologies. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 14(SI-3), 73-83. https://doi.org/10.14419/smpb4t93

Received date: April 28, 2025

Accepted date: July 21, 2025

Published date: August 15, 2025