Mineralogical studies of plagioclase feldspar in Kadavur Anorthosite Complex, Tamilnadu

Authors

  • M.Vinoth Kumar

    Dept. of Earth sciences Annamalai University Annamalai Nagar-608002.

  • R. S. Kumar

  • K. Rajaprian

  • Kuldeep Singh

How to Cite

Kumar, M., Kumar, R. S., Rajaprian, K., & Singh, K. (2014). Mineralogical studies of plagioclase feldspar in Kadavur Anorthosite Complex, Tamilnadu. International Journal of Advanced Geosciences, 2(2), 31-37. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijag.v2i2.1921

Received date: February 7, 2014

Accepted date: March 1, 2014

Published date: March 9, 2014

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14419/ijag.v2i2.1921

Abstract

The differences in the type of plagioclase twinning in igneous and metamorphic rocks are described. Plagioclase twins are divided, from a Petrological point of view, into the c-twin and the A-twin. Frequencies of the twinned plagioclase and twin types in various endogenous rocks are described and the genesis of the C-twin which characterizes the volcanic and plutonic rocks is interpreted. Lastly, a plagioclase twin method for determining the origin of various granitic rocks is proposed and discussed. Extremely dense Carlsbad twins at the unit-cell scale indicate that additional energy caused by the Carlsbad twin boundaries in highly disordered anorthite is lower than that caused by albite twin boundaries. We propose that for anorthite with an initially disordered structure the total energy induced by Carlsbad twinning is lower than that caused by albite twinning and higher than that caused by albite twinning in anorthite with an initially ordered structure.

 

Keywords: Mineralogical Studies, Plagioclase Twinning Law, Kadavur Anorthosite Complex.

References

  1. Buerger, MJ. (1945) the genesis of twin crystals. American Mineralogist, 30, 469-482.
  2. Gorai, M. (1951) Petrological studies of plagioclase twins. American Mineralogist, 36, 884-90.
  3. Dowty, E. (1980) Atomic structure of Carlsbad and Carlsbad-albite twins in feldspar. Zeitschrift Kristallographie, 152, 201-206.
  4. Brown.WL and Macaudiere, J (1986) Mechanical twinning of plagiclase in a deformed Meta anorthosite: The production of M-twinning. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 92, 44-56.
  5. Amitabha S, Mihar Bose K. (1987) Geology of Kadavur com-plex, Tamilnadu, Recent researches in geology 13: 97-107.
  6. Wooster, W.A. (1981) Atomic arrangements on the twin boundaries of orthoclase twins. Mineralogical Magazine, 44, 351-353.
  7. Tobi, A.C. (1962) Characteristic patterns of plagioclase twin-ning. Norsk geol. Tidsskr, 42-2, 264-271.
  8. Tobi, A.C. (1987) Recognition of plagioclase twinning at sig-nificant rock property.proc. Koninkiijke Nederlands Akad. Van Watenschappen 65(4), ser.B.pp.576-581.
  9. Suwa, K. (1956) Plagioclase twinning in Ryoke metamorphic rocks from the Mitsue-mura area, Kii peninsula, central Japan. Jour. Earth Sci., Nagoya Univ., 4, 91-122.
  10. Suwa, K., Mizutani, S. and Tsuzuki, Y. (1974) Proposed optical method of determining the twinning laws of plagioclase. Mem. Geol. Soc. Japan, no. 11, 167-250
  11. Smith, J.V. (1974) Feldspar Minerals 2 (Chemical and Textural Properties). Springer-Verlag, 690p.
  12. Ross, J.V., (1957) Combination of twining in plagioclase feldspars .American Journal of Science.Vol.225, pp.650-655.

Downloads

How to Cite

Kumar, M., Kumar, R. S., Rajaprian, K., & Singh, K. (2014). Mineralogical studies of plagioclase feldspar in Kadavur Anorthosite Complex, Tamilnadu. International Journal of Advanced Geosciences, 2(2), 31-37. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijag.v2i2.1921

Received date: February 7, 2014

Accepted date: March 1, 2014

Published date: March 9, 2014