The Role of Religiosity in Functional Value, Trust Engagement, and Intentions to Reuse

Authors

  • Sabilar Rosyad

    Faculty of Economics and Business, University Sebelas Maret Surakarta, Indonesia

  • Lilik wahyudi

    Faculty of Economics and Business, University Sebelas Maret Surakarta, Indonesia

  • Budhi Haryanto

    Faculty of Economics and Business, University Sebelas Maret Surakarta, Indonesia

  • Catur Sugiarto

    Faculty of Economics and Business, University Sebelas Maret Surakarta, Indonesia

How to Cite

Rosyad , S. ., wahyudi, L., Haryanto, B. ., & Sugiarto, C. . (2025). The Role of Religiosity in Functional Value, Trust Engagement, and Intentions to Reuse. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 12(4), 291-300. https://doi.org/10.14419/skjnha82

Received date: June 19, 2025

Accepted date: August 5, 2025

Published date: August 12, 2025

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14419/skjnha82

Keywords:

Religiousity; Functional Value; Trust; Engagement; Recycle Market‎.

Abstract

Given the growing interest in alternative consumption channels, this paper discusses a conceptual framework for examining the relationship ‎between online consumers' repeated online perceived value of recycled products and their repurchase intentions from recycling platforms. ‎This study aims to test the conceptual model and validate the model with one type of product. Based on cognitive, social, and sub-cultural ‎theory, trust (seller and platform) and involvement in consumer-to-consumer online marketplaces are hypothesized to mediate consumers' ‎perceived functional value and their intention to reuse, as well as adding the moderating variable Religiousity. For the religiosity moderation ‎variable, it can be seen that the religiosity moderation variable moderates the functional value of trust(Seller and platform). This study ‎highlights the implications of trust and engagement and how these factors influence consumer intentions to reuse C2C online recycling mar-‎marketplace platforms‎.

References

  1. A Bandura (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology; New York Vol. 4, Iss. 3. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359.
  2. B Bigliardi, D Campisi, G Ferraro, S Filippelli, F Galati, A Petroni (2020). The Intention to Purchase Recycled Products: Towards an Integrative Theoretical Framework. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9739. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229739.
  3. Babakus, E., & Boller, GW (1992). An empirical assessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Business Research, 24(3), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(92)90022-4.
  4. Babin, BJ, Darden, WR, & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644–656. https://doi.org/10.1086/209376.
  5. Bauman, A., & Bachmann, R. (2017). Online consumer trust: Trends in research. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 12(2), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242017000200008.
  6. Biz, S. (2018). Seek koho ni kiita ureru aitemu message kosho saretara. Sankei Biz.
  7. Borusiak, B., Szymkowiak, A., Horska, E., Raszka, N., & Zelichowska, E. (2020). Towards building sustainable consumption: A study of second-hand buying intentions. Sustainability, 12(3), 875. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030875.
  8. Bresciani, S., Ferraris, A., Santoro, G., & Nilsen, HR (2016). Wine sector: Companies'performance and green economy as a means of societal mar-keting. Journal of Promotion Management, 22(2), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2016.1121753.
  9. Brodie, RJ, Ilic, A., Juric, B., & Hollebeek, L. (2013). Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Business Research, 66(1), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.029.
  10. Career, M. (2021). Top 12 items Mercari's most expensive products sold. Retrieved from https://money-career.com/article/141#i-1.
  11. Cervellon, M., Carey, L., & Harms, T. (2012). Something old, something used: Determinants of women's purchases of vintage fashion vs second-hand fashion. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 40(12), 956–974. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590551211274946.
  12. Chen, J., Zhang, C., & Xu, Y. (2009). The role of mutual trust in building members' loyalty to a C2C platform provider. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 14(1), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415140105.
  13. Chen, X., Huang, Q., Davison, RM, & Hua, Z. (2014). june). The moderating effects of contextual factors on a buyer's trust in e-commerce plat-forms and sellers., PACIS, 107.
  14. Chitturi, R., Raghunathan, R., & Mahajan, V. (2007). from versus function: How the intensities of specific emotions are evoked in functional versus hedonic trade-offs mediate product preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(4), 702–714. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.4.702.
  15. Chiu-PH, Yi-Fang C, Heng CH (2012). How experience-driven community identification generates trust and engagement. Online Information Re-views. Vol. 36 No. 1, 2012 pp. 72-88. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521211206971.
  16. Clement, AP, Jiaming, F., & Li, L. (2020). Green advertising and purchase decisions in live-streaming B2C and C2C interactive marketing. Interna-tional Journal of Information and Management Sciences, 31(2), 191–212.
  17. DeLone, WH & McLean, ER., (2003), The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update', Journal of management Information Systems, vol 19(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748.
  18. DeLone, WH & McLean, ER (1992), Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3, pp:60–95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60.
  19. [Fogg, BJ (2003, April). Prominence-interpretation theory: Explaining how people assess credibility online. CHI'03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 722-723. https://doi.org/10.1145/765891.765951.
  20. Furnell, C., & Larcker, DF (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313.
  21. Gomaa Agag, Ahmed A. El-Masry (2016). Understanding consumer intention to participate in online travel community and effects on consumer intention to purchase online travel and WOM: An integration of innovation diffusion theory and TAM with trust. Computers in Human Behavior xxx (2016) 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.038.
  22. Grabner-Kraeuter, S. (2002). The role of consumers' trust in online shopping. Journal of business ethics, 39(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016323815802.
  23. Guiot, D., & Roux, D. (2010). A second-hand shoppers' motivation scale: Antecedents, consequences, and implications for retailers. Journal of re-tailing, 86(4), 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2010.08.002.
  24. H Usman, Dipa M, Chairy C, Nucke W (2020). Integrating trust, religiosity and image into technology acceptance model: the case of Islamic phi-lanthropy in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Marketing Vol. 13 No. 2, 2022 pp. 381-409. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-01-2020-0020.
  25. Hair, JF, Black, WC, Babin, BJ, Anderson, RE, & Tatham, RL (2006). Structural equation modeling: An introduction. Multivariate Data Analysis, 705–768.
  26. Hans Van Eyghen (2015) Religion and science , Applied Sociology, Sociology of Culture, Sociology of Religion. Issue No: 4Page Range: 301-312.
  27. Hards, S. (2011). Social practice and the evolution of personal environmental values. Environmental Values, 20, 23–42. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327111X12922350165996.
  28. Harris, LC, & Goode, MM (2004). The four levels of loyalty and the pivotal role of trust: A study of online service dynamics. Journal of Retailing, 80(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2004.04.002.
  29. Hart, P., & Saunders, C. (1997). Power and trust: Critical factors in the adoption and use of electronic data interchange. Organization Science, 8(1), 23–42. Hawlitschek, F., Teuber, T., & Gimpel, H. (2016). Understanding the sharing economy: Drivers and implications for participation in peer-to-peer rentals. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Forty-Ninth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-49).
  30. He, H., & Harris, L. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on corporate social responsibility and marketing philosophy. Journal of business re-search, 116, 176–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.030.
  31. Heinonen, K., Jaakkola, E., & Neganova, I. (2018). Drivers, types and value outcomes of customer-to-customer interaction: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 28(6), 710–732. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-01-2017-0010.
  32. Higgins, TE (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280–1300. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280.
  33. Hirschman, EC, & Holbrook, MB (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298204600314.
  34. Holbrook, MB (Ed.). (1999). Consumer values: a framework for analysis and research. Psychology Press.
  35. Holbrook, MB, & Hirschman, EC (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Re-search, 9(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1086/208906.
  36. Hollebeek, LD (2018). Individual-level cultural consumer engagement styles: Conceptualization, propositions and implications. International Mar-keting Review, 35(1), 42–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-07-2016-0140.
  37. Hong, IB, & Cho, H. (2011). The impact of consumer trust on attitudinal loyalty and purchase intentions in B2C e-marketplaces: Intermediary trust vs. trust seller. International journal of information management, 31(5), 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.02.001.
  38. Hong, JC, Lin, PH, & Hsieh, PC (2017). The effect of consumer innovativeness on perceived value and continuance intention to use smartwatch. Computers in Human Behavior, 67(February), 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.001.
  39. Horton, JJ, & Zeckhauser, RJ (2016). Owning, using, and renting: some simple economics of the “sharing economy”(No. w22029). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w22029.
  40. Hsu, C., Chiang, Y., & Huang, H. (2012). How experience-driven community identification generates trust and engagement. Online Information Review, 36(1), 72–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521211206971.
  41. Hsu, M., Chang, C., Chu, K., & Lee, Y. (2014). Determinants of Repurchase Intention in Online Group-Buying: The Perspectives of DeLone & McLean IS Success Model and Trust. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 234-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.065.
  42. Huang, M., Song, M., Lee, LH, & Ching, WK (2013). Analysis for strategy of closed-loop supply chain with dual recycling channel. International journal of production economics, 144(2), 510–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.04.002.
  43. J Gaur, M Amini, P Banerjee, R Gupta (2015),"Drivers of consumer purchase intentions for remanufactured products", Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, Vol. 18 Issue 1 p. 30 - 47. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-01-2014-0001.
  44. JJ Escario, C Rodriguez-Sanchez, LV Casaló (2020). The influence of environmental attitudes and perceived effectiveness on recycling, reducing and reusing packaging materials in Spain. Waste Management 113 (2020) 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.05.043.
  45. J Sihvonen, LLM Turunen (2016). As good as new – valuing fashion brands in the online second-hand markets. Journal of Product & Brand Man-agement, 25/3 (2016) 285–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-06-2015-0894.
  46. Jillian C. Sweeney, Geoffrey N. Soutar (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing 77 (2001) 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0.
  47. Jones, K., & Leonard, LN (2014). Factors influencing buyer's trust in consumer-to-consumer e-commerce. Journal of Computer Information Sys-tems, 54(4), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2014.11645724.
  48. Kempf, DS (1999). Attitude formation from product trial: Distinct roles of cognition and affect for hedonic and functional products. Psychology & Marketing, 16(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199901)16:1<35::AID-MAR3>3.0.CO;2-U.
  49. Kim, Y., & Peterson, RA (2017). A Meta-analysis of Online Trust Relationships in E-commerce. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 38, 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2017.01.001.
  50. Koller, M., Floh, A., & Zauner, A. (2011). Further insights into perceived value and consumer loyalty: A "green" perspective. Psychology & Mar-keting, 28(12), 1154–1176. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20432.
  51. Komiak, SX, & Benbasat, I. (2004). Understanding customer trust in agent-mediated electronic commerce, web-mediated electronic commerce, and traditional commerce. Information technology and management, 5(1), 181–207. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ITEM.0000008081.55563.d4.
  52. Kotler, P. (1972). A generic concept of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 36(2), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297203600209.
  53. Lane, R., Horne, R., & Bicknell, J. (2009). Routes of reuse of second-hand goods in Melbourne households. Australian Geographer, 40(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049180902964918.
  54. Liang, J., & Xu, Y. (2018). Second-hand clothing consumption: A generational cohort analysis of the Chinese market. International Journal of Con-sumer Studies, 42(1), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12393.
  55. Lin, J., Li, L., Yan, Y., & Turel, O. (2018). Understanding Chinese consumer engagement in social commerce: The roles of social support and swift guanxi. Internet Research, 28(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-11-2016-0349.
  56. Lindell, MK, & Whitney, DJ (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.1.114.
  57. Liu, W., Shao, W., & Wang, Q. (2021). Psychological distance from environmental pollution and willingness to participate in second-hand online transactions: An experimental survey in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, Article 124656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124656.
  58. Lovelock, CB (1991). Services marketing (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  59. Luchs, MG, & Kumar, M. (2017). “Yes, but this other one looks better/works better”: How do consumers respond to trade-offs between sustaina-bility and other valued attributes? Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 567–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2695-0.
  60. Luchs, MG, Brower, J., & Chitturi, R. (2012). Product choice and the importance of aesthetic design given the emotion-laden trade-off between sustainability and functional performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(6), 903–916. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00970.x.
  61. McDonald, S., Oates, CJ, Thyne, M., Timmis, AJ, & Carlile, C. (2015). Flying in the face of environmental concern: Why do green consumers con-tinue to fly. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(13–14), 1503–1528. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2015.1059352.
  62. McKinsey & Company. (2021). C2C e-commerce: Could a new business model sell more old goods?. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/technology-media-and-telecommunications/our-insights/c2c-ecommerce-could-a-new-business-model-sell-more-old-goods.
  63. Mercari (2020). Mercari Announces Business Strategy at “Mercari Conference 2020” Retrieved from https://about.mercari.com/en/press/news/articles/mercari_conference/.
  64. Mollen, A., & Wilson, H. (2010). Engagement, telepresence and interactivity in online consumer experience: Reconciling scholastic and managerial perspectives. Journal of Business Research, 63(9–10), 919–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.05.014.
  65. Moriuchi, E. (2021). The impact of country of origin on consumers' pricing judgments in eCommerce settings. International Marketing Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-10-2019-0245.
  66. Moriuchi, E., & Takahashi, I. (2016). Satisfaction trust and loyalty of repeat online consumers within the Japanese online supermarket trade. Aus-tralasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 24(2), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2016.02.006.
  67. Moriuchi, E., & Takahashi, I. (2022). An empirical study on repeat consumer's shopping satisfaction on C2C e-commerce in Japan: the role of value, trust and engagement in C2C e-commerce in Japan. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-08-2021-0631.
  68. Moriuchi, E., & Takahashi, I. (2022). The role of perceived value, trust and engagement in the C2C online secondary marketplace. Journal of Busi-ness Research 148 (2022) 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.029.
  69. N Hein (2022). Factors Influencing the Purchase Intention for Recycled Products: Integrating Perceived Risk into Value-Belief-Norm Theory. Sus-tainability 2022, 14, 3877. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073877.
  70. Nielsen (2017) Online Shopping Report. Retrieved from https://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/nielsenglobal/de/docs/Nielsen%20Global%20Connected%.
  71. PW Schultz, LC Zelezny (1998). Values and proenvironmental behavior: A five-country survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology Volume 29, Issue 4 Pages: 540 - 558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022198294003.
  72. Pagani, M., Racat, M., & Hofacker, CF (2019). Adding voice to the omnichannel and how that affects brand trust. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 48, 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2019.05.002.
  73. Pallas, F., Mittal, V., & Groening, C. (2014). Allocation of resources to customer satisfaction and delight based on utilitarian and hedonic benefits. Journal of Research in Marketing, 2(1), 106-112. https://doi.org/10.17722/jorm.v2i1.25.
  74. Papaoikonomou, E. (2013). Sustainable lifestyles in an urban context: Towards a holistic understanding of ethical consumer behavior. Empirical ev-idence from Catalonia, Spain. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(2), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2012.01111.x.
  75. Pasual-Miguel, FJ, Agudo-Peregrina,´AF, & Chaparro-Pelaez, J. (2015). Influences of gender and product type on online purchasing. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1550–1556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.050.
  76. Peltier, JW, Dahl, AJ, & Swan, EL (2020). Digital information flows across a B2C/C2C continuum and technological innovations in service ecosys-tems: A service-dominant logic perspective. Journal of Business Research, 121, 724–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.020.
  77. Phipps, M., Ozanne, LK, Luchs, MG, Subrahmanyan, S., Kapitan, S., Catlin, JR, & Weaver, T. (2013). Understanding the inherent complexity of sustainable consumption: A social cognitive framework. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1227–1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.016.
  78. Reiley, K., & DeLong, M. (2011). A consumer vision for sustainable fashion practices. Fashion Practice, 3(1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.2752/175693811X12925927157054.
  79. Roderick J. Brodie, Ana Ilic, Biljana Juric, Linda Hollebeek (2011). Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Business Research 66 (2013) 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.029.
  80. Sanchez, J., Callarisa, L., Rodriguez, RM, & Moliner, MA (2006). Perceived value of the purchase of a tourism product. Tourism Management, 27(3), 394–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2004.11.007.
  81. Schirmer, N., Ringle, CM, Gudergan, SP, & Feistel, MS (2018). The link between customer satisfaction and loyalty: The moderating role of cus-tomer characteristics. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 26(4), 298–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2016.1240214.
  82. Sihvonen, J., & Turunen, LLM (2016). As good as new – valuing fashion brands in the online second-hand markets. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 25(3), 285–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-06-2015-0894.
  83. Singh, J., & Sirdeshmukh, D. (2000). Agency and trust mechanisms in consumer satisfaction and loyalty judgments. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (1), 150–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300281014.
  84. Skarlatidou, A., Cheng, T., & Haklay, M. (2013). Guidelines for trust interface design for public engagement Web GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27(8), 1668–1687. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2013.766336.
  85. Sun, Heshan. (2010), Transferring Attributes of E-Commerce Systems into Business Benefits: A Relationship Quality Perspective, Journal of Elec-tronic Commerce Research, 11(2).
  86. Usman H, Prijono T, Tengku EB, I. Gusti NA (2017). The role of religious norms, trust, importance of attributes and information sources in the rela-tionship between religiosity and selection of Islamic banks. Journal of Islamic Marketing, Vol. 8 No. 2, 2017 pp. 158-186. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-01-2015-0004.
  87. Wang Yi shun (2008), Assessing e-commerce systems success: a respecification and validation of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success, Information Systems Journal, 18, pp: 529–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00268.x.
  88. WH DeLone, ER McLean (2004). Measuring e-Commerce Success: Applying the DeLone & McLean Information Systems Success Model. Interna-tional Journal of Electronic Commerce / Fall 2004, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2004.11044317.
  89. X Zheng, M Lee, CMK Cheung (2017). Examining e-loyalty towards online shopping platforms: the role of coupon proneness and value conscious-ness. Internet Research, Vol. 27 Issues: 3. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-01-2016-0002.

Downloads

How to Cite

Rosyad , S. ., wahyudi, L., Haryanto, B. ., & Sugiarto, C. . (2025). The Role of Religiosity in Functional Value, Trust Engagement, and Intentions to Reuse. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 12(4), 291-300. https://doi.org/10.14419/skjnha82

Received date: June 19, 2025

Accepted date: August 5, 2025

Published date: August 12, 2025