A Study on Primary Sources of Job Stress Among Government Administrative Staff

Authors

  • M. Fasina

    Research Scholar, Department of Commerce, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, Coimbatore, India; Assistant Professor, PTM Govt College, Perinthalmanna, Kerala, India

  • Dr.V. Sudha

    Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, Coimbatore, India

How to Cite

Fasina, M. ., & Sudha , D. . (2025). A Study on Primary Sources of Job Stress Among Government Administrative Staff. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 12(SI-1), 252-258. https://doi.org/10.14419/5d85as33

Received date: May 28, 2025

Accepted date: June 13, 2025

Published date: August 28, 2025

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14419/5d85as33

Keywords:

Job Stress; Government Administrative Staff; Workplace Stressors; Coping Mechanisms; Employee Well-Being; Stress Management; Work-Life Balance.

Abstract

Government administrative staff face major issues with workplace stress due to stress stressful nature of their work, high public expectations, and organizational stress. This study investigates the leading causes of stress at jobs related to government employees and assesses the effectiveness of methods and techniques of coping with stress. According to the analysis, the most problematic stressors for the employees are the high pressure of public service duties, precariousness of the job, and lack of career evolution. Other contributing factors to increased stress levels are interpersonal conflicts, work-life imbalance, and heavy workloads with strict deadlines. The variation on the impact of such stressors is confirmed to be statistically significant by a Friedman Test, thus calling for targeted interventions for each issue. The study explores how coping with various techniques presents some of the most effective ways to reduce stress, as shown by ANOVA results, such as being involved in physical activities and wellness programs, taking part in stress management programs led by leaders, and having work flexibility. Other fruitful approaches, such as continuous skill development and prioritized work, add to employee resilience and satisfaction on the job. Based on the findings, structured support systems, proactive leader engagement, and adaptive workplace policies will be needed to help shape a healthier and more productive work environment. In government administrative settings, these measures can be implemented and can greatly contribute to the well-being of employees, lowering workplace stress and increasing the total efficiency of the organization.

References

  1. Ahmadi, S. A. A., & Dehghani, H. (2015). Outsourcing to the private sector in terms of productivity IRIB South Khorasan with a focus on Agile Manufacturing. International Academic Journal of Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 2(1), 48–59.
  2. Anderson, P., Brown, T., & Wilson, K. (2023). Workplace interventions for stress reduction: An evaluation of mindfulness and wellness programs in government offices. Journal of Occupational Health, 45(3), 112-129.
  3. Barile, J., Carreño, E., & los Ríos-Escalante, D. (2024). A review of mollusks farming in Chile. International Journal of Aquatic Research and Envi-ronmental Studies, 4(1), 63-69. https://doi.org/10.70102/IJARES/V4I1/6
  4. Bašić, Z. (2018). Analysis of the Application of Roadway Constructions in the Local Network Roads. Archives for Technical Sciences, 2(19), 29–34.
  5. Clark, R., & Simmons, L. (2022). The impact of work-life balance on employee stress and productivity in public sector organizations. Public Ad-ministration Review, 78(2), 89-104.
  6. Ghosh, A., & Chatterjee, V. (2023). Electrocoagulation-Assisted Filtration for the Removal of Emerging Pollutants in Wastewater. Engineering Perspectives in Filtration and Separation, 1(1), 5-8.
  7. Johnson, M., & Miller, S. (2024). Workload, role ambiguity, and burnout: Analyzing stress factors among government employees. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 56(4), 301-320.
  8. Martinez, D. (2021). Chronic workplace stress and its psychological impact on government employees: A longitudinal study. Journal of Workplace Mental Health, 34(1), 45-61.
  9. Mohammad Abbas, L., Shivraj, K. S., Perachi Selvi, U., Balasubramani, R., & Dhanasekaran, S. (2024). Exploring the Relationship Between Aca-demic Science and Economics Through Biofuel Research: A Scientometric Analysis. Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services, 14(1), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.51983/ijiss-2024.14.1.4112
  10. Mustapha, S. B., Alkali, A., Nwaydo, N. C., & Mbusube, B. G. (2016). Assessment of Agricultural Extension Service Delivery on Dry Season On-ion Production in Bama Local Government Area of Borno State, Nigeria. International Academic Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 141–147.
  11. Roberts, H., & Lewis, J. (2023). Bureaucratic inefficiencies and job stress: The role of digital transformation in modern government institutions. Public Sector Research Quarterly, 29(3), 210-228.
  12. Talegaon, S., & Krishnan, R. (2020). Administrative models for role based access control in android. Journal of internet services and information security, 10(3), 31-46.
  13. Leigh, J. P. (2017). Economic burden of occupational stress. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 59(10), 923–928. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001119
  14. Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). (2020). Concepts Statement No. 6: Communication Methods in General Purpose External Financial Reports That Contain Basic Financial Statements. Norwalk, CT: GASB.
  15. Prabhakar, C. P. (2023). Zero-trust architectures in enterprise networks: A framework for enhanced cyber resilience. Electronics, Communications, and Computing Summit, 1(1), 59–66.
  16. Surendar, A. (2025). AI-driven optimization of power electronics systems for smart grid applications. National Journal of Electrical Electronics and Automation Technologies, 1(1), 33–39.
  17. Rahim, R. (2025). Lightweight speaker identification framework using deep embeddings for real-time voice biometrics. National Journal of Speech and Audio Processing, 1(1), 15–21.
  18. Velliangiri, A. (2025). An edge-aware signal processing framework for structural health monitoring in IoT sensor networks. National Journal of Sig-nal and Image Processing, 1(1), 18–25.
  19. 2. Abdullah, D. (2025). Metamaterial-based antenna for beam steering in 5G mmWave bands. National Journal of RF Circuits and Wireless Sys-tems, 2(2), 8–13.
  20. Sathish Kumar, T. M. (2024). Developing FPGA-based accelerators for deep learning in reconfigurable computing systems. SCCTS Transactions on Reconfigurable Computing, 1(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.31838/RCC/01.01.01
  21. Tandi, M. R., & Shrirao, N. M. (2025). Optimizing sustainable energy microgrids in smart cities using IoT and renewable energy integration. Journal of Smart Infrastructure and Environmental Sustainability, 2(1), 45–50.
  22. Sajaratuddur, S. (2022). CFD analysis of wind turbine using shear stress transfer model. Journal of Green Energy and Transition to Sustainability, 1(1), 34–44.
  23. Dahal, R. K. (2024). Security-centric hardware architectures for advanced embedded applications. Electronics, Communications, and Computing Summit, 2(2), 68–75.
  24. Sawitri, N. P. Y. R., WIKSUANA, I., Wiagustini, N. L. P., & Candraningrat, I. R. (2025). Smart investment choices: navigating stock decisions across generations x, y, and z. Quality-Access to Success, 26(205).

Downloads

How to Cite

Fasina, M. ., & Sudha , D. . (2025). A Study on Primary Sources of Job Stress Among Government Administrative Staff. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 12(SI-1), 252-258. https://doi.org/10.14419/5d85as33

Received date: May 28, 2025

Accepted date: June 13, 2025

Published date: August 28, 2025